Founding families get a free diagnostic assessment. Join the waitlist →

Coming soon to OttawaFrançais

A young tree grows on a paper island cut away at the front to show its roots, and a child kneeling beside a mentor holds a magnifying glass over the one root that glows gold.

Adaptive learning

Every gap has a root. We find it first.

When your child struggles with something new, the cause is often something older. Our tutoring finds that skill, fixes it and checks again.

At a glance

Three things that change for your child.

Tutoring that starts at the cause, not at this week’s worksheet.

  • The real cause, found

    A diagnostic assessment and short checks trace a struggle to the skill underneath, often from an earlier grade.

  • Time spent where it counts

    Practice goes to the root skill, not to more of what your child already knows or can’t do yet.

  • Skills that hold

    Fresh questions show a skill is mastered, and it comes back weeks later so it lasts.

The mastery map

Every skill stands on others.

Adding fractions rests on equivalent fractions, which rest on multiplication facts. Skills are built on skills, all the way down.

Each child’s map is built from their diagnostic and every check since, and follows the Ontario curriculum for their grade.

How the platform builds each map
Maya · Mastery graph
Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Place valueAdding and subtractingMultiplication factsWhat division meansMeasuringFractions as partsMulti-digit multiplicationEquivalent fractionsDecimals to tenthsArea and perimeterLong divisionAdding decimalsComparing fractionsVolumeAdding unlike fractions92%74%41%

Root found

Multiplication facts

Grade 3

What her mentor does nextThree short lessons on the 6, 7 and 8 times tables, with patterns she can see, then a fresh check.

MasteredWorking onGap foundTraced back to the rootSelect any skillIllustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

The root-cause loop

Find the cause. Then make it last.

Follow Zoe, in Grade 6, from one missed question to a skill that holds. Run the loop a step at a time.

Z
ZoeGrade 6

Her mastery map

  1. Grade 6Adding fractions with different denominators
    MissedMissedMissedMasteredMastered
  2. Grade 5Equivalent fractions
    ShakyWorking onMasteredMastered
  3. Grade 4Multiplication facts: 6s and 7s
    RootWorking onMasteredMastered
  4. Grade 3Fractions as equal parts
    SecureSecureSecureSecure

A short mastery check

Zoe misses two of three questions on adding fractions. The pattern in her answers matters more than the score.

Mastery check · adding fractions

  • 1/2 + 1/3 =2/5
  • 2/3 + 1/4 =3/7
  • 1/4 + 2/4 =3/4

The pattern

She adds the tops and the bottoms when the pieces aren’t the same size.

Back to the skill underneath

Quick probes on earlier skills find where it breaks: equivalent fractions wobble, and her 6 and 7 multiplication facts aren’t secure.

Probes on earlier skills

Equivalent fractions

  • 1/2 =3/6
  • 2/3 =8/12
  • 5/6 =30/42

Multiplication facts

  • 6 × 4 =24
  • 6 × 7 =48
  • 7 × 8 =54

Root found

Her 6s and 7s aren’t secure, so finding a common denominator is guesswork.

Fix the root first

Her learning plan puts the facts and same-sized pieces first, in short, focused blocks with her mentor.

Learning plan · the next two weeks

  1. FirstMultiplication facts: 6s and 7s, a short recall every day
  2. ThenSame-sized pieces: fraction strips, then common denominators
  3. LastAdding fractions, worked through with her mentor

Fresh questions, same skill

Back to adding fractions, with questions she hasn’t seen. All three are right: mastered.

Mastery check · fresh questions

  • 2/5 + 1/3 =11/15
  • 3/4 + 1/6 =11/12
  • 1/2 + 2/7 =11/14

Mastered

Come back, so it lasts

The skill comes back after one week, then three, then seven, further apart each time.

Spaced revisits

Week 1Week 3Week 7Scheduled

Every visit uses new questions.

Illustrative example.

For your family

You’ll know what changed, and why.

Every month, a progress update in plain words: what your child mastered, the cause we found and what comes next.

Hikmah Tutoring+

Catching up now
If your child is falling behind in math, reading or writing, the loop starts at the gap, often a skill from an earlier grade, with every skill mapped to the Ontario curriculum.
Ready for later
Each fixed root makes the next skill easier, so your child can move ahead of grade on solid ground.
Explore Tutoring+

Progress update

November
Z
ZoeGrade 6

This month

Zoe mastered adding fractions with different denominators.

The cause we found

Her mistakes traced back to equivalent fractions and her 6 and 7 multiplication facts. We fixed those first, and her mastery check came back clean.

Skills

  • Adding fractionsMastered
  • Equivalent fractionsMastered
  • Multiplication facts: 6s and 7sMastered
  • Comparing fractionsNext

Try at home

Ask her why 1/2 + 1/3 isn’t 2/5. She’ll draw you the pieces.

Her mentor
Illustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

The difference

By the calendar, or by mastery.

Homework help and test drills work on the question in front of your child. We start with the cause, and move on when it’s mastered.

We expect fixed root gaps to show up in schoolwork and on the report card. We aim for that; we don’t promise marks.

Moves on with the calendarGap left behindGap left behindMoves on with masteryRoot fixedAhead, on solid ground
Illustrative example.

Where it starts

The usual wayThis week’s worksheet

At HikmahA diagnostic assessment that looks back through earlier grades

A missed question

The usual wayMore of the same practice

At HikmahTraced back to the skill underneath

Before a test

The usual wayDrilling practice tests

At HikmahMastery checks with fresh questions, spaced over weeks

When to move on

The usual wayWhen the unit ends

At HikmahWhen a mastery check shows they really get it

What you hear

The usual wayA mark

At HikmahThe cause, the fix and what comes next

The research

What the research says. And what we’ll measure.

Hikmah hasn’t opened, so we have no results of our own yet. Here is the published research behind mastery, tutoring and practice that lasts, and what we’ll track from the first day.

  • Meta-analysis · 108 evaluations

    Mastery learning

    Moving on only after mastering each step, with feedback and correction, raised final exam scores by about half a standard deviation on average (0.52): roughly from the 50th to the 70th percentile. These were course exams, and 91 of the 108 evaluations were college courses; on standardized tests the effects were much smaller.

    Kulik, Kulik and Bangert-Drowns (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265–299. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

  • Meta-analysis · 89 randomized trials

    Tutoring, from preschool to Grade 12

    Tutoring raised achievement by about 0.29 standard deviations on average, in reading and in math. Effects were largest in the early grades, in programs meeting at least three times a week, and with teachers or trained paraprofessionals.

    Nickow, Oreopoulos and Quan (2024). The promise of tutoring for PreK–12 learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. American Educational Research Journal. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

  • Classic study · A classic study and a review

    One to one, measured honestly

    Bloom reported that students tutored one to one with mastery learning outperformed a regular class by about two standard deviations. A later review of controlled studies found smaller, still large effects: about 0.79 for human tutors and 0.76 for step-by-step computer tutors.

    Bloom (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

    VanLehn (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

  • Experiments and a meta-analysis · Students and adults · 317 experiments reviewed

    Checks and spaced revisits

    In lab experiments, students who took short tests on a passage remembered more a week later than students who reread it, and a review of 317 experiments, mostly with adults learning words and facts, found that spacing practice out helps learning last. We apply both to children’s practice.

    Roediger and Karpicke (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

    Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted and Rohrer (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. Read the source (opens in a new tab)

Reading the numbers: effects are in standard deviations. An effect of 0.5 moves an average student from the middle of the group to about the 69th percentile.

What we’ll measure

From the first day, with your consent.

Hikmah has no results yet. These are the questions we’ll track for every child, and publish methods first.

See our research agenda
  1. How far back is the root?

    How often a struggle traces to a skill from an earlier grade, and which skills those are.

  2. How long does mastery take?

    Each skill, from the first attempt to the mastery check, and what helped.

  3. Does it hold?

    Results at every revisit, weeks and months after a skill was mastered.

The fastest way forward is often one step back.

Find out where your child really is.

Founding families in Ottawa receive a free diagnostic assessment when we open: what your child has mastered, and where any gaps began.